1979. Choose a complex and important character in a novel or a play of recognized literary merit who might on the basis of the character's actions alone be considered evil or immoral. In a well-organized essay, explain both how and why the full presentation of the character in the work makes us react more sympathetically than we otherwise might. Avoid plot summary.
Lennie Small in John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men is an important character who, on the basis of his actions alone might be considered evil or immoral. Steinbeck fully presents Lennie in a way, though, that makes the reader react more sympathetically than if they were going off of only actions. Steinbeck does this in order to show the importance of friendship and to dramatize the idea that the American Dream isn't always plausible.
Steinbeck gives Lennie a mental disability in order to help the readers sympathize with Lennie's otherwise evil actions. He is a character that, on the surface, kills animals and people. Multiple times throughout the book, Lennie is seen killing a mouse or anything with fur. Without any background information, this might seem like an evil man killing innocent animals. However, since Lennie acts a lot younger than his age due to his disability, the readers don't make him responsible for his actions. When the readers don't blame him for his wrong doings, it makes it a lot easier to like his character and allows the reader to value the bond between Lennie and George. In the end the bond between the two characters ends tragically and when George must kill Lennie for his own good. Since the readers were sympathetically attached to Lennie, it drove home the importance of friendship between the two and allowed for the reader to understand that the character's dreams will not come true, thus showing that the idealistic American dream isn't guaranteed.
Steinbeck also portrays Lennie as a kid in a man's body in order to help the readers react more sympathetically. Lennie is characterized as a big, burly man who can lift more weight than anyone his size. This ideal characteristic, though, is unimportant to him. Instead, Lennie wants a farm, a dog, and other things that make him seem childish. As time goes on, Steinbeck's descriptions and imagery allow the reader to see Lennie as a child. His dependence on George is another thing that makes him into a little kid. Since he is only "a child" his actions seem innocent and harmless even though he kills living things. Lennie is simply unaware of his true strength and doesn't understand what he is capable of doing. This, too, shows the American dream isn't always possible. No matter what Lennie wants or works for, he simply can't reach his goals. He cannot stop killing animals, he cannot stop getting in trouble, and he cannot act like an adult. Since he cannot do any of these things, it makes the dream impossible to reach.
Through George, Steinbeck also helps the reader sympathize with Lennie. George is constantly having to deal with Lennie and get him out of all kinds of trouble. While this is hard for George, it still makes the reader cringe when George is yelling at Lennie and doesn't seem to understand that he is just a kid. Steinbeck uses George to help take care of Lennie as well, adding to his innocence. Between the two there is a bond that is unbreakable. Sadly, their friendship is put to the test when George has to kill Lennie. Though Lennie's death might look like a good thing if one were to just take into account his actions, it really is a sad moment for the reader. Steinbeck created a character that is easily loved and, when he dies, the American dream the two characters shared died as well.
All in all, Steinbeck uses many techniques to help the readers sympathize with Lennie, a character that seems immoral on the surface. Through his mental disorder, his child-like innocence, and his best friend George, Lennie is a character that is not easily forgotten. The friendship shown and the tragic ending shows the reader that not all dreams come true.
Ok, straight off the bat, this is A+! However, I did want to address a few nit picky things.
ReplyDelete1. Sentence starters: try and avoid repetition. (ie saying Steinbeck a lot, maybe try and just incorporate other articles in place of his name to increase flow 2. In body paragraph 1 you say that the author "gives" him a mental disability. I am not sure if it is PC or whatever, but it also just doesn't... flow right to me. It is just too involved of a verb. (Am I making any sense?) Maybe try, 'He writes lenny as having x y z" or something on those lines. yes? ok. 3. General flow, but nothing monumental. Again, all i can do is nitpick because it is so good! :D
Good Job!
Erin Donahue
I agree with Erin that this is a well thought out essay, but I think you should add some quotes to strangthen your arguements/claims. I like how you tied in the idea of the American Dream into your reasoning of why Steinbeck might have created Lennie the way he did. Overall your supprots are well explained and your conclusion ties the whole essay together, so great job!
ReplyDeleteI think you do an awesome job of clearly sticking to the point. Comparing this to your previous draft, there are subtle changes, but I don't think much were needed. I find it interesting how you were able to support you claim so well without direct quotes. I don't think you need quotes only because you might not have a text in front of you during the test. Your writing still has enough evidence with examples from the story. At times, I think that you get a little bit repetitious. For instance, writing about how George takes care of Lennie and their significance in friendship. Other than that, I really need to learn to write like you(:
ReplyDelete